Find a lawyerOur capabilitiesYour career
Locations
Our capabilities
News

Select language:

Locations
Our capabilities
News

Select language:

hamburger menu showcase image
  1. Our thinking
  2. London M&A Forum
  3. The next cycle

The next cycle

hero-image-0

The London M&A Forum convened at a moment when global dealmaking is reopening, but into conditions that bear little resemblance to the previous cycle. What emerged was not a forecast for the market, but a framework for the next cycle: one in which judgment, rather than process mastery alone, has become the defining capability in modern M&A.

Complexity and uncertainty are no longer temporary disruptions to be managed around. They are the defining conditions in which deals are now conceived, assessed and executed.

Three principles crystallised across the discussions:

Judgment begins earlier. Whether in merger control, activism defence, exit readiness or board decision-making, the critical choices that determine outcomes are made well upstream of traditional decision points. Deals that assume complexity can be managed late in the process are increasingly exposed.

Credibility is the currency. From “does this deal have a government license?” to “can we evidence our strategic case under regulatory scrutiny?” to “will our shareholder base believe us when pressure arrives?”, transactions succeed or fail based on whether they command belief. Credibility is built through governance, proof and alignment – and it evaporates quickly when inconsistencies surface.

Restraint is a strategic choice. The most effective boards are not those that pursue every opportunity. They are those that define clearly what they are prepared – and crucially, not prepared – to do.

The 2026 M&A cycle will not be defined by those who wait for clarity to return. It will be defined by those who build judgment infrastructure now.

As Frank Partnoy suggested during the Forum, one response to this environment is the discipline of the pre-mortem: imagining failure early enough to expose the assumptions, dependencies and fragilities a deal may not survive. In a market where uncertainty cannot be eliminated, that kind of structured anticipation becomes a source of advantage.

What follows from the London M&A Forum is not a prediction, but a message about discipline. In a market defined by structural complexity, the deals that succeed are not those that rely on mastering process alone. They are those designed from the outset to withstand judgment – by regulators, shareholders, boards, markets and governments – across the full lifecycle of the transaction.

The new discipline of dealmaking is this: recognising early where the old rulebook no longer applies, and acting with conviction in response. We look forward to picking up this conversation at next year’s London M&A Forum, as the next cycle takes shape.

London M&A Forum

Introduction
1. Executive summary
2. Foreword from Lucy Rigby KC MP
3. Why merger control now shapes the deal itself
4. Why shareholder activism is a governance verdict
5. Why liquidity is earned through governance discipline, not just timing
6. Why post-deal disputes now reflect deal pressure, not just drafting
7. Why the board’s job is to embrace complexity to achieve success
8. The next cycle

Contacts

New York

Elizabeth K. Bieber

Partner
London

Kate Cooper

Partner
London

Andrew Hutchings

Partner
New York, San Francisco

Gayle Klein

Co-head of US litigation, arbitration and global investigations
London

Oliver Lazenby

Partner
London

Julian Long

Partner
New York, San Francisco

Alan Mason

Global Managing Partner
London, Brussels

Martin McElwee

Partner
London

Piers Prichard Jones

Partner
London

Julian Pritchard

Partner, Head of Global Transactions
London

Victoria Sigeti

Partner
London

Claire Wills

Partner
Washington, DC

Christine Wilson

Partner
NAVIGATE TO
About usLocations and officesYour careerOur thinkingOur capabilitiesNews
CONNECT
Find a lawyerAlumniContact us
NEED HELP
Fraud and scamsComplaintsTerms and conditions
LEGAL
AccessibilityCookiesLegal noticesTransparency in supply chains statementResponsible procurementPrivacy

Select language:
Select language:
© 2026 Freshfields. Attorney Advertising: prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome