Find a lawyerOur capabilitiesYour career
Locations
Our capabilities
News

Select language:

Locations
Our capabilities
News

Select language:

hamburger menu showcase image
  1. Our thinking
  2. Blogs
  3. A Fresh Take
  4. FinCEN Adopts Rule Extending AML/CFT Requirements to RIAs and ERAs, Further Increasing Regulatory Obligations on Investment Advisers
2MIN

FinCEN Adopts Rule Extending AML/CFT Requirements to RIAs and ERAs, Further Increasing Regulatory Obligations on Investment Advisers

Subscribe
Sep 9 2024

On August 28, 2024, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) adopted a final rule that extends anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) compliance obligations to certain types of investment advisers (the Final Rule), and delegates to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the authority to examine investment advisers’ compliance with these obligations.  The Final Rule ends a long-running debate over whether to subject investment advisers to AML/CFT obligations after multiple prior proposals to do so had stalled.  

The Final Rule imports standards and requirements that will be familiar to investment advisers affiliated with financial institutions already subject to AML/CFT obligations, but may be new to smaller and independent investment advisers.  For these entities, the compliance uplift required could be substantial.

The Final Rule is substantially similar to FinCEN’s initial proposal (the Proposed Rule) released in February (which we discuss here).  However, some modifications are noteworthy, including that the Final Rule clarified the scope of investment advisers subject to its requirements and did not adopt a proposal that investment advisers’ AML/CFT program must be performed by persons in the U.S.  Absent further developments, the compliance date for the Final Rule is January 1, 2026.

The Final Rule is separate from two other pending proposals that could affect investment advisers’ AML/CFT requirements—a joint rule proposed by FinCEN and the SEC that would require investment advisers to implement a customer identification program (CIP) (which we discuss here) and a comprehensive proposal by FinCEN to update the AML/CFT program requirement generally (which we discuss here).  Although changes could result from these proposals, investment advisers would do well to begin assessing their readiness to comply with the Final Rule sooner than later, especially those that are not affiliated with financial institutions already subject to comprehensive AML/CFT compliance requirements. 

Read our overview of how the Final Rule would apply to investment advisers here.

To receive the latest insights on US legal developments, subscribe to the Freshfields A Fresh Take Blog.

Tags

financial regulatoryfinancial services

Authors

New York

David Sewell

Partner & US Head of Financial Services Regulatory
New York

Timothy J. Clark

Global Co-Head of Private Funds and Secondaries
New York

Ivet Bell

Partner
Washington, DC

David Nicolardi

Partner

Nathaniel Balk

Associate
New York

Nariné Atamian

Senior Associate
Latest Insights

Latest Insights

NAVIGATE TO
About usLocations and officesYour careerOur thinkingOur capabilitiesNews
CONNECT
Find a lawyerAlumniContact us
NEED HELP
Fraud and scamsComplaintsTerms and conditions
LEGAL
AccessibilityCookiesLegal noticesTransparency in supply chains statementResponsible procurementPrivacy

Select language:
Select language:
© 2026 Freshfields. Attorney Advertising: prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome